Harris v. State
717 So. 2d 615, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11941, 1998 WL 646536
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2359 →
Opinion
In this direct criminal appeal, appellant raises only one issue-whether he is entitled to a new trial because his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective. We affirm, without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to raise the issue in an appropriate motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Dennis v. State, 696 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 717 So. 2d 615, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11941, 1998 WL 646536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 615 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dennis v. State
696 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)