Harris v. State
695 So. 2d 742, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12426, 1996 WL 640545
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 7, 1996·No. No. 95-3647·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Although we affirm the appellant’s conviction for possession of cannabis with intent to sell, we vacate the habitual felony offender sentence because possession with intent to sell is “a violation of section 893.13 relating to the purchase or the possession of a controlled substance.” § 775.084(l)(a)3, Fla. Stats.; see Grene v. State, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1145, — So.2d - [1996 WL 252248] (Fla. 3d DCA May 15, 1996); Houser v. State, 666 So.2d 158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
The conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 695 So. 2d 742, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12426, 1996 WL 640545 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
695 So. 2d 742 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kleckley v. State of Florida
S.D. Florida, 2023
Shine v. State
129 So. 3d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Ellis v. State
703 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)