Harris v. State
780 So. 2d 980, 2001 WL 246003
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 713 So. 2d 1106 →
Opinion
We affirm the order denying post-conviction relief in most respects. However, upon the state’s concession, we reverse and remand appellant’s three sentences in 98-12149, 98-12570, and 98-12578, imposed as both a prison releasee reoffender (PRR) and as a habitual offender. On remand, the trial court should sentence appellant only under the Prison Releasee Reoffender statute. Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); Yehowshua v. State, 773 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 780 So. 2d 980, 2001 WL 246003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
780 So. 2d 980 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yehowshua v. State
773 So. 2d 654 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)