Harris v. State
667 So. 2d 265, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9168, 1995 WL 511605
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 1995·No. No. 94-3619·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
In this direct appeal, the appellant challenges a sentence that he claims exceeds the guidelines. A review of the record indicates that appellant’s guidelines scoresheet incorrectly classifies the sentenced offenses as first degree felonies where they should have been scored as second degree felonies. This error resulted in the appellant receiving a sentence that exceeds the permitted range of a properly prepared scoresheet.
Accordingly, we vacate the sentence in this case and remand for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 667 So. 2d 265, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9168, 1995 WL 511605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
667 So. 2d 265 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fortune v. State
776 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Harris v. State
733 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)