Harris v. State

627 So. 2d 1341, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13211, 1993 WL 530938
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1993·No. No. 92-0920·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER curiam:.

Affirmed. With respect to the sentencing issue, we recognize that Appellant was, initially, improperly sentenced because the trial judge used separate scoresheets for this case and a separate case pending at the same time. However, both sentences were addressed by this court in Harris v. State, 619 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) in which the trial court was directed on remand to sentence Appellant using a single scoresheet. Therefore, the issue is moot.

ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 627 So. 2d 1341, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13211, 1993 WL 530938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 1341 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
653 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)