Harris v. State

614 So. 2d 691, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3054, 1993 WL 66270
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 574 So. 2d 243
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1993·No. No. 93-00551·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Harris appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. The motion, which was brought pursuant to State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990), seeks belated appellate review of Harris’s conviction and sentence for escape. We find that the motion sets forth a prima facie showing of Harris’s entitlement to relief, and thus that the trial court erred in denying the motion without an evidentiary hearing or attachment of records. We reverse for further proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Reversed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 614 So. 2d 691, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3054, 1993 WL 66270 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

614 So. 2d 691 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.
569 So. 2d 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)