Harris v. State

564 So. 2d 273, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5432, 1990 WL 105501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 520 So. 2d 639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 1990·No. No. 87-03084·Published

Opinion

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant, Alfred Bernard Harris, appeals his convictions and sentences for three counts of sexual battery, burglary with an assault, robbery, and trespass of a structure. The defendant’s only meritorious point on appeal concerns costs. We agree that the trial court erred in imposing costs without affording the defendant notice or opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the costs provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to the defendant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 564 So. 2d 273, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5432, 1990 WL 105501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 273 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)