Harris v. State

660 So. 2d 762, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9011, 1995 WL 502190
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 610 So. 2d 36
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 1995·No. No. 95-01922·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant seeks review of the denial of a motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

Contrary to a statement in the trial court’s order, the defendant’s motion, filed less than four months after the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in the defendant’s appeal became final, was timely. The trial court was correct, however, in its determination that the claims raised in the motion are without merit. Accordingly, the order denying the defendant’s motion is affirmed.

BLUE, AC.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 660 So. 2d 762, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9011, 1995 WL 502190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

660 So. 2d 762 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.