Harris v. State

657 So. 2d 1284, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147, 1995 WL 449653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 610 So. 2d 36
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 1995·No. No. 94-2240·Published

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for sexual battery, but reverse the trial court’s imposition of a lien for the public defender’s services, because the court did not notify the accused of his right to a hearing to contest the amount. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.720(d). We remand with directions to the trial court to conduct a hearing, during which appellant may contest the amount of the lien. Stewart v. State, 645 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); L.AD. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 268 (Fla.1993).

[1285]*1285AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 657 So. 2d 1284, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147, 1995 WL 449653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

657 So. 2d 1284 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State
616 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Stewart v. State
645 So. 2d 580 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)