Hamilton v. State
150 S.W. 775, 68 Tex. Crim. 47, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 537
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 1912·No. No. 1874.·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
— Appellant was charged with and convicted of a misdemeanor. He did not enter into a recognizance during the term, but attempts to perfect his appeal by entering into an appeal bond subsequent to the adjournment of court.. This confers no jurisdiction on this court. (Art. 918, Code of Criminal Procedure; Herron v. State, 27 Texas, 337; Cook v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 671.)
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. State, 150 S.W. 775, 68 Tex. Crim. 47, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 537 (Tex. 1912).
150 S.W. 775 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Welch v. State
199 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Knowlton and Dominguez v. State
169 S.W. 674 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)