Hamilton v. State

141 S.W. 966, 64 Tex. Crim. 175, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 549
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 15, 1911·No. No. 1376.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was indicted, charged with murder, and when tried, he was adjudged guilty of murder in the second degree, and his punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

The assistant attorney-general has filed a motion to dismiss this *177 appeal, because the transcript does not contain the sentence, or final judgment of the court. We have carefully examined the transcript, and it not containing the final judgment of the court, sentencing appellant, the motion must be sustained. Dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 141 S.W. 966, 64 Tex. Crim. 175, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 549 (Tex. 1911).

141 S.W. 966 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cain v. State
549 S.W.2d 707 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Starling v. State
522 S.W.2d 505 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Ross v. State
273 S.W. 582 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Esquivel v. State
246 S.W. 399 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Hoffman v. State
209 S.W. 747 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
McPeak v. State
187 S.W.2d 754 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Lee v. State
148 S.W. 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)