Hale v. City of New York
This text of 251 A.D. 826 (Hale v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting respondent’s application for an order directing the police department to furnish to respondent a copy of the police blotter report of an automobile accident reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the application denied, with ten dollars costs. The statutes do not require the furnishing of a copy of the police blotter to a petitioner without the consent of the police commissioner. (Matter of Rippner, N. Y. L. J. June 20, 1935, p. 3185, and cases cited therein: Jahnke v. City of New York, Id. Oct. 10, 1936, p. 1120; Riker v. City of New York, Id. Nov. 25, 1935, p. 2056.) The records of the police department of the city of New York are not public records within the contemplation of section 51 of the General Municipal Law. They are specifically exempted from the provisions of section 1545 of the Greater New York Charter that are applicable to other departments. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 826, 296 N.Y.S. 443, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hale-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1937.