Yude v. Cruise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yude v. Cruise

261 A.D. 938, 25 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8168

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 938 (Yude v. Cruise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yude v. Cruise, 261 A.D. 938, 25 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8168 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s application for a subpcena duces tecum directing the police department of the city of New York to produce at the trial of the action the records of the alleged accident which is the subject-in&tter of the suit, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (New York City Charter, §§ 893, 894; Hale v. City of New York, 251 App. Div. 826.) Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, with the following memorandum: The subpoena duces tecum should issue. It is for the trial court to decide on the admissibility of the documents produced. (Friedeberg v. Haffen, 162 App. Div. 79; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U. S. v. Mpasstas, 256 id. 878.) Sections 893 and 894 of the City Charter do not hinder that procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s application for a subpcena duces tecum directing the police department of the city of New York to produce at the trial of the action the records of the alleged accident which is the subject-in&tter of the suit, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (New York City Charter, §§ 893, 894; Hale v. City of New York, 251 App. Div. 826.) Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, with the following memorandum: The subpoena duces tecum should issue. It is for the trial court to decide on the admissibility of the documents produced. (Friedeberg v. Haffen, 162 App. Div. 79; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U. S. v. Mpasstas, 256 id. 878.) Sections 893 and 894 of the City Charter do not hinder that procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 938, 25 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yude-v-cruise-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack