Yude v. Cruise

261 A.D. 938, 25 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8168
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1941·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s application for a subpcena duces tecum directing the police department of the city of New York to produce at the trial of the action the records of the alleged accident which is the subject-in&tter of the suit, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (New York City Charter, §§ 893, 894; Hale v. City of New York, 251 App. Div. 826.) Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, with the following memorandum: The subpoena duces tecum should issue. It is for the trial court to decide on the admissibility of the documents produced. (Friedeberg v. Haffen, 162 App. Div. 79; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U. S. v. Mpasstas, 256 id. 878.) Sections 893 and 894 of the City Charter do not hinder that procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yude v. Cruise, 261 A.D. 938, 25 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8168 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 938 (Yude v. Cruise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Coleman
75 Misc. 2d 1090 (New York County Courts, 1973)
Blaikie v. Borden Co.
47 Misc. 2d 180 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Scott v. County of Nassau
43 Misc. 2d 648 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)