Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization
This text of 307 U.S. 496 (Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
By leave of Court, the Committee on the Bill of Rights of the American Bar Association, filed a brief, as amid curiae, discussing the right of assembly. See p. 678.
The judgment of the eoúrt in this case is that the decree is modified and as modified affirmed. Mr. Justice Eéankfurter and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Mr. Justice Roberts has an opinion in which Mr. Justice Black concurs, and Mr. Justice Stone an opinion in which Mr. Justice Reed concurs. The Chief Justice concurs in an opinion. Mr. Justice McReynolds and Mr. Justice Butler dissent for reasons stated in opinions by-them respectively.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1067, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haguer-v-committee-for-industrial-organization-scotus-1939.