Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization

307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1067, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 501
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 5, 1939·No. 651·Published·Cited by 2,170 cases

Opinions

By leave of Court, the Committee on the Bill of Rights of the American Bar Association, filed a brief, as amid curiae, discussing the right of assembly. See p. 678.

Mr. Justice Butler,

presiding in the absence of the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice McReynolds:

The judgment of the eoúrt in this case is that the decree is modified and as modified affirmed. Mr. Justice Eéankfurter and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Mr. Justice Roberts has an opinion in which Mr. Justice Black concurs, and Mr. Justice Stone an opinion in which Mr. Justice Reed concurs. The Chief Justice concurs in an opinion. Mr. Justice McReynolds and Mr. Justice Butler dissent for reasons stated in opinions by-them respectively.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1067, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 501 (1939).

307 U.S. 496 (Haguer v. Committee for Industrial Organization) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Doe v. 1
Fourth Circuit, 2016
Van Deelen v. Johnson
535 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (D. Kansas, 2008)
. Myers v. Loudoun County School Board
500 F. Supp. 2d 539 (E.D. Virginia, 2007)
Van Arnam v. General Services Administration
332 F. Supp. 2d 376 (D. Massachusetts, 2004)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Gittens
215 F. Supp. 2d 120 (District of Columbia, 2002)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Giuliani
105 F. Supp. 2d 294 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Housing Works, Inc. v. Safir
101 F. Supp. 2d 163 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1995
Act-Up v. Walp
755 F. Supp. 1281 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
Paulsen v. Lehman
745 F. Supp. 858 (E.D. New York, 1990)
Nelson v. Moline School District No. 40
725 F. Supp. 965 (C.D. Illinois, 1989)
Berg v. Groschen
437 N.W.2d 75 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1989)
Smith v. Lindstrom
699 F. Supp. 549 (W.D. Virginia, 1988)
State of Md. v. Barry
604 F. Supp. 495 (District of Columbia, 1985)
U.C. Nuclear Weapons Labs Conversion Project v. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory
154 Cal. App. 3d 1157 (California Court of Appeal, 1984)
United States v. Parisi
564 F. Supp. 855 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
Brandon v. BOARD OF ED. OF GUILDERLAND
487 F. Supp. 1219 (N.D. New York, 1980)