Home/Texas Supreme Court/Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc.

Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc.

344 S.W.2d 429, 161 Tex. 560, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 334, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 699
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 22, 1961
DocketA-8198
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 344 S.W.2d 429 (Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc., 344 S.W.2d 429, 161 Tex. 560, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 334, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 699 (Tex. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

While the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, (341 S.W. 2d 461) on the construction of Article 2226, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. Stats., relating to the allowance of attorney’s fees, is strictly in accordance with our holding in Meaders v. Biskamp, 159 Texas 79„ 316 S.W. 2d 75, and although we approve of the other holdings made by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion, we may not refuse the application for writ of error because the matter of the construction of Article 2226 was not raised in this court by application for writ of error. The respondent, while unsuccessful upon the attorney’s fees point in the Court of Civil Appeals, filed no application for writ of error in this court. As a consequence, our authority to decide the issue has not been invoked. Accordingly the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.

Opinion delivered February 22,1961.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G.R.A.V.I.T.Y. Enterprises, Inc. v. Reece Supply Co.
177 S.W.3d 537 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Carter v. Hegar
595 S.W.2d 612 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Caro v. Haywood
585 S.W.2d 354 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Larcon Petroleum, Inc. v. Autotronic Systems, Inc.
576 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Lawyers Title Co. of Houston v. Authur
569 S.W.2d 578 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1975
Superior Stationers Corp. v. Berol Corporation
483 S.W.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
King v. United Distributing of Texas, Inc.
463 S.W.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
George Linskie Co. v. Miller-Picking Corp.
456 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Eisenbeck v. Buttgen
450 S.W.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Hooker v. Kirk
379 S.W.2d 407 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Ford Motor Company v. DAVIS BROTHERS. INC.
369 S.W.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Van Zandt v. Fort Worth Press
359 S.W.2d 893 (Texas Supreme Court, 1962)
Coulson v. Alvis Auto Rentals, Inc.
352 S.W.2d 849 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Langdeau v. Bouknight
344 S.W.2d 435 (Texas Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 S.W.2d 429, 161 Tex. 560, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 334, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guay-v-schneider-bernet-hickman-inc-tex-1961.