Griffith v. State
290 S.W.3d 842, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1209, 2009 WL 2750442
Opinion
*843 Order
Brock A. Griffith appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, he presents two points, in which he claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to allegedly inadmissible testimony. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griffith v. State, 290 S.W.3d 842, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1209, 2009 WL 2750442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 842 (Griffith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Griffith
392 S.W.3d 572 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)
James v. State
290 S.W.3d 842 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)