James v. State
290 S.W.3d 842, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1208, 2009 WL 2734649
Opinion
ORDER
Lavelle James appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, after an eviden-tiary hearing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. State, 290 S.W.3d 842, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1208, 2009 WL 2734649 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 842 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Griffith v. State
290 S.W.3d 842 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)