James v. State

248 S.W.3d 689, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 435, 2008 WL 842506
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 644
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2008·No. WD 68548·Published

Opinion

*690 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Henry James appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 (2007). James pled guilty to possessing an illegal weapon, was sentenced, and released on probation. Prior to the expiration of the probationary period, James violated the terms of his probation and the court issued a capias warrant for his arrest. James was not apprehended and his sentence imposed, however, until after the probationary period had expired. After the court executed the suspended sentence, James sought the vacation of the sentence. He now appeals claiming that the sentencing court lacked jurisdiction because the probationary period had expired and the court failed to take every reasonable effort to notify James and conduct a hearing. We affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 248 S.W.3d 689, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 435, 2008 WL 842506 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

248 S.W.3d 689 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.