Griffith v. State

369 S.W.3d 790, 2012 WL 3025955, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 921
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1209
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 2012·No. No. WD 73668·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Mario Griffith appeals the denial of a post-conviction relief motion under Rule 29.15. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to certain testimony.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffith v. State, 369 S.W.3d 790, 2012 WL 3025955, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

369 S.W.3d 790 (Griffith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.