State v. Griffith

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Griffith

389 S.W.3d 745, 2013 WL 216360, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 83

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 22, 2013

DocketNo. WD 74230

StatusPublished

This text of 389 S.W.3d 745 (State v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Griffith, 389 S.W.3d 745, 2013 WL 216360, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 83 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Megan E. Griffith appeals her conviction by a Clay County jury of first-degree involuntary manslaughter under section 565.024.1(1), RSMo 2000. Griffith argues that the court erred in instructing the jury on involuntary manslaughter in that there was no evidence of recklessness presented at trial and she was therefore prejudiced by the instruction. Further, she argues that, due to the lack of evidence of recklessness, there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Megan E. Griffith appeals her conviction by a Clay County jury of first-degree involuntary manslaughter under section 565.024.1(1), RSMo 2000. Griffith argues that the court erred in instructing the jury on involuntary manslaughter in that there was no evidence of recklessness presented at trial and she was therefore prejudiced by the instruction. Further, she argues that, due to the lack of evidence of recklessness, there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 S.W.3d 745, 2013 WL 216360, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-griffith-moctapp-2013.