Grayson Heat Control, Ltd. v. Los Angeles Gas Appliance Co.

40 F. Supp. 928, 51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 11, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2811
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedSeptember 10, 1941
DocketNo. 472
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 F. Supp. 928 (Grayson Heat Control, Ltd. v. Los Angeles Gas Appliance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grayson Heat Control, Ltd. v. Los Angeles Gas Appliance Co., 40 F. Supp. 928, 51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 11, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2811 (S.D. Cal. 1941).

Opinion

JENNEY, District Judge.

This case is now before the court upon objections by both plaintiff and defendant to the Special Master’s Report. The action is by Grayson Heat Control, Ltd., owner of Letters Patent No. 1,699,468 and No. 1,957,774, issued to John H. Grayson on January 15, 1929, and May 8, 1934, respectively. Plaintiff charges infringement of both letters patent and unfair competition. Jurisdiction is invoked solely under the patent laws of the United States. Defendant denies both infringement and unfair competition and alleges that the patents in suit are invalid in law and anticipated by prior patents and publications.

The charges of infringement and unfair competition arise out of the sale of water heaters equipped with allegedly infringing thermostatic valves. The suit is openly defended by the Domestic Manufacturing Co., Inc., which admittedly is the manufacturer of the thermostatic valves in issue.

The master found claims 20 and 22 of No. 1,699,468 valid and infringed, and claim 10 of No. 1,957,774 valid, but not infringed. He also found defendant guilty of unfair competition. Each side has excepted to all adverse findings.

The general field involved is that of thermostatically controlled valves and, specifically, the use of such valves in connection with gas water heaters of the storage type which are today in common use. These water heaters consist of a storage tank, heated by a gas burner, which is controlled to maintain the water in the tamk at temperatures within a predetermined range. Thermostatic valves used for this purpose are of two general types. The first and oldest is the throttling or graduating type, which starts and gradually increases the flow of gas as the water cools and, as the temperature rises, gradually decreases and finally cuts off the flow. The second is the snap action type, with which this case deals. These valves open at a fixed minimum temperature, permitting gas to flow at the optimum rate until a fixed maximum temperature is reached; at which point the valve operates to shut off the flow of gas. This latter type has certain advantages, in that the burner operates at highest efficiency at all times, bypassing is unnecessary, and back firing is eliminated.

The functioning of plaintiff’s devices and the defendant’s device, and the state of .the prior art may be best understood by examining the following diagrams:

[931]*931

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 F. Supp. 928, 51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 11, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grayson-heat-control-ltd-v-los-angeles-gas-appliance-co-casd-1941.