Gray v. State
138 S.E. 916, 37 Ga. App. 123, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 513
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Ga. App. 596 →
Opinion
These defendants were indicted separately but tried together. The evidence as to both was the same, was en[124]*124tirely circumstantial, and was not sufficient as to either defendant to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It follows that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Clifton v. State, 34 Ga. App. 590 (130 S. E. 359); Wilson v. State, 32 Ga. App. 427 (123 S. E. 623), and cit.; Toney v. State, 30 Ga. App. 61 (116 S. E. 550); Vaughn v. State, 29 Ga. App. 388 (115 S. E. 670).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. State, 138 S.E. 916, 37 Ga. App. 123, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 513 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
138 S.E. 916 (Gray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vaughn v. State
115 S.E. 670 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Toney v. State
116 S.E. 550 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Wilson v. State
123 S.E. 623 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Clifton v. State
130 S.E. 359 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)