Clifton v. State
130 S.E. 359, 34 Ga. App. 590, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 432
Opinion
The conviction of the defendant depended wholly upon circumstantial evidence, and the evidence was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of her guilt. It follows that the court erred in overruling her motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clifton v. State, 130 S.E. 359, 34 Ga. App. 590, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 432 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
130 S.E. 359 (Clifton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gray v. State
138 S.E. 916 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)