Clifton v. State
130 S.E. 359, 34 Ga. App. 590, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 432
This text of 130 S.E. 359 (Clifton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clifton v. State, 130 S.E. 359, 34 Ga. App. 590, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 432 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
The conviction of the defendant depended wholly upon circumstantial evidence, and the evidence was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of her guilt. It follows that the court erred in overruling her motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gray v. State
138 S.E. 916 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 359, 34 Ga. App. 590, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-v-state-gactapp-1925.