Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gray v. State

127 S.E. 414, 33 Ga. App. 596, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 620

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 27, 1925

Docket16163

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 127 S.E. 414 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. State, 127 S.E. 414, 33 Ga. App. 596, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 620 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwortii, J.

1. Grounds 1 and 2 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complain'of the admission of certain evidence over the objection of the defendant. What objections were made does not appear. It has been frequently held by the appellate courts of this State that a ground of a motion for new trial based upon the admission of evidence should state the objection made to the evidence, and that such objection was urged at the time the evidence was offered; otherwise no question is raised for determination. Boatright v. State, 30 Ga. App. 10 (110 S. E. 557), and cases cited; Langston v. State, 153 Ga. 127 (1) (111 S. E. 561).

2. Under the foregoing ruling the court did not err in refusing to rule out the evidence incorporated in each of the other special grounds of the motion.

3. A verdict approved by the trial judge will not be disturbed by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence, when supported by any evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwortii, J.

1. Grounds 1 and 2 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complain'of the admission of certain evidence over the objection of the defendant. What objections were made does not appear. It has been frequently held by the appellate courts of this State that a ground of a motion for new trial based upon the admission of evidence should state the objection made to the evidence, and that such objection was urged at the time the evidence was offered; otherwise no question is raised for determination. Boatright v. State, 30 Ga. App. 10 (110 S. E. 557), and cases cited; Langston v. State, 153 Ga. 127 (1) (111 S. E. 561).

2. Under the foregoing ruling the court did not err in refusing to rule out the evidence incorporated in each of the other special grounds of the motion.

3. A verdict approved by the trial judge will not be disturbed by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence, when supported by any evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.E. 414, 33 Ga. App. 596, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-gactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack