Boatright v. State

116 S.E. 556, 30 Ga. App. 9, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 210
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 1923
Docket14048
StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 556 (Boatright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boatright v. State, 116 S.E. 556, 30 Ga. App. 9, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 210 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the two special grounds of motion for a new trial excepting to extracts from the charge of the court are, when the charge is read in its entirety, wholly without merit. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 556, 30 Ga. App. 9, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatright-v-state-gactapp-1923.