City of Rome v. McWilliams
This text of 88 S.E. 931 (City of Rome v. McWilliams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The nature of the ease fully appears from previous reports of it in 138 Ga. 581 (75 S. E. 645), and 142 Ga. 848 (83 S. E. 945). The evidence authorized the verdict.
2. It is a well-established rule of practice that a ground of a motion for new trial based upon the admission of evidence should state the objection made to the evidence, and that such objection was urged at the time the objection was made; otherwise no question is raised for determination. Hill v. Chastain, 138 Ga. 750 (75 S. E. 1130) ; Dunn v. Evans, 139 Ga. 741 (3), 742 ( 78 S. E. 122); Chambers v. State, 141 Ga. 652 (81 S. E. 880); G. & F. Ry. Co. v. Stapleton, 143 Ga. 46 (84 S. E. 120).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.E. 931, 145 Ga. 191, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-rome-v-mcwilliams-ga-1916.