Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Boatright v. State

Boatright v. State

116 S.E. 556, 30 Ga. App. 9, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 210
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boatright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Ga. App. 10 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 6, 1923·No. 14048·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the two special grounds of motion for a new trial excepting to extracts from the charge of the court are, when the charge is read in its entirety, wholly without merit. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boatright v. State, 116 S.E. 556, 30 Ga. App. 9, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 210 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

116 S.E. 556 (Boatright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.