Vaughn v. State

115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 388, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 21
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1923·No. 14066·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence in this case was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Tyson & Tyson, for plaintiff in error. J. Saxton Daniel, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughn v. State, 115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 388, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 21 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

115 S.E. 670 (Vaughn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McBurnett v. State
146 S.E. 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Gray v. State
138 S.E. 916 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Jackson v. State
136 S.E. 286 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Marshall v. State
127 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)