Vaughn v. State
115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 388, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 21
This text of 115 S.E. 670 (Vaughn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vaughn v. State, 115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 388, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 21 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinion
The evidence in this case was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McBurnett v. State
146 S.E. 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Gray v. State
138 S.E. 916 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Jackson v. State
136 S.E. 286 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Marshall v. State
127 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 670, 29 Ga. App. 388, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-state-gactapp-1923.