Jackson v. State

136 S.E. 286, 36 Ga. App. 211, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 876
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1926·No. 17693·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, and was not sufficient to exclude every'reasonable hypothesis save that of her guilt, and the refusal to grant her a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 30 Ga. App. 61; 32 Ga. App. 427; 28 Ga. App. 625; Id. 463; 29 Ga. App. 388; 33 Ga. App. 678; 34 Ga. App. 699; 25 Ga. App. 427; 24 Ga. App. 268; 23 Ga. App. 141; Id. 9; 29 Ga. App. 47; 28 Ga. App. 543; 24 Ga. App. 357.

Alec Harris, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 136 S.E. 286, 36 Ga. App. 211, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 876 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

136 S.E. 286 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freeman v. State
67 S.E.2d 314 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)