McCarty v. State
113 S.E. 31, 28 Ga. App. 625, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 730
Opinion
The evidence adduced upon the trial being insufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, it was error to overrule his motion for a new trial.
■Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCarty v. State, 113 S.E. 31, 28 Ga. App. 625, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 730 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
113 S.E. 31 (McCarty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Harrell v. State
142 S.E. 746 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Jackson v. State
136 S.E. 286 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Marshall v. State
127 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)