McCarty v. State

113 S.E. 31, 28 Ga. App. 625, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 730
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1922
Docket13410
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 31 (McCarty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarty v. State, 113 S.E. 31, 28 Ga. App. 625, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 730 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence adduced upon the trial being insufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, it was error to overrule his motion for a new trial.

■Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Harrell v. State
142 S.E. 746 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Jackson v. State
136 S.E. 286 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Marshall v. State
127 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 31, 28 Ga. App. 625, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarty-v-state-gactapp-1922.