Graham v. State

683 So. 2d 627, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12457, 1996 WL 681075
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 642
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 27, 1996·No. No. 95-03131·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon her plea of guilty to second degree murder the trial court sentenced the appellant to twenty years’ incarceration followed by ten years’ probation, which sentence was within the terms of the plea bargain. The appellant’s counsel then filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have reviewed the record in accordance with In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), and agree with counsel that no meritorious grounds exist to reverse the conviction or sentence. However, we do note that a special condition of probation was imposed that the trial court did not pronounce at sentencing. Therefore, the special condition that the appellant pay for drug testing during her probationary term is stricken. Hamilton v. State, 653 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). In all other respects we affirm.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. State, 683 So. 2d 627, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12457, 1996 WL 681075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 627 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Hamilton v. State
653 So. 2d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
In Re Anders Briefs
581 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)