Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Graham v. State

Graham v. State

649 So. 2d 354, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 1995 WL 46610
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1053
StatusPublished

This text of 649 So. 2d 354 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. State, 649 So. 2d 354, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 1995 WL 46610 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for carrying a concealed weapon and the two conditions of probation which follow his jail sentence, except that portion of condition (4) which states, “without first procuring the consent of your Officer” and that portion of condition (6) which states “You will not use intoxicants to excess,” as to which we remand with direction to strike. See Washington v. State, No. 94-1271,1995 WL 134179 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 25, 1995); Zeigler v. State, 647 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Jennings v. State, 645 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

DELL, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zeigler v. State
647 So. 2d 272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Jennings v. State
645 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Washington v. State
658 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
649 So. 2d 354, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 1995 WL 46610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.