Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Graham v. State

Graham v. State

680 So. 2d 535, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6327, 1996 WL 325109
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3338
StatusPublished

This text of 680 So. 2d 535 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. State, 680 So. 2d 535, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6327, 1996 WL 325109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is remanded for correction of the restitution order to reflect the amount of restitution orally pronounced. See Trueblood v. State, 635 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (“It is well-settled that the oral pronouncement of a sentence prevails over the written judgment and sentence form.”). See also R.S. v. State, 664 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 2d [536]*536DCA 1995) (remanding for correction of restitution order to reflect amount orally pronounced at sentencing). The trial court orally imposed restitution of $200. Apparently due to a scrivener’s error, the written order imposes a restitution amount of $2,000.

MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trueblood v. State
635 So. 2d 1024 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
R.S. v. State
664 So. 2d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 So. 2d 535, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6327, 1996 WL 325109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.