Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State

895 So. 2d 1283, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3560, 2005 WL 602928
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-219
StatusPublished

This text of 895 So. 2d 1283 (Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodriguez v. State, 895 So. 2d 1283, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3560, 2005 WL 602928 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raul Emilio Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”), filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Without addressing the merits, we deny Rodriguez’s petition because he filed it more than two years after his conviction became final and the petition does not contain a sworn statement alleging he was misled about the results of the appeal by counsel. Therefore, Rodriguez does not avoid the two year time bar of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4)(B). [1284]*1284See McCray v. State, 699 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCray v. State
699 So. 2d 1366 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 1283, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3560, 2005 WL 602928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.