Graham v. State

649 So. 2d 354, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 1995 WL 46610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 642
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1995·No. No. 94-1053·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for carrying a concealed weapon and the two conditions of probation which follow his jail sentence, except that portion of condition (4) which states, “without first procuring the consent of your Officer” and that portion of condition (6) which states “You will not use intoxicants to excess,” as to which we remand with direction to strike. See Washington v. State, No. 94-1271,1995 WL 134179 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 25, 1995); Zeigler v. State, 647 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Jennings v. State, 645 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

DELL, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. State, 649 So. 2d 354, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 971, 1995 WL 46610 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

649 So. 2d 354 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zeigler v. State
647 So. 2d 272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Jennings v. State
645 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Washington v. State
658 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)