Gorman v. O'Connor

26 A. 379, 155 Pa. 239, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1231
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 17, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 9·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

An examination of the somewhat voluminous record in this case has satisfied us that the learned master’s findings of fact were warranted by the pleadings and proofs; and there appears to be no error in any of his legal conclusions that requires either reversal or modification of the decree. The controlling facts, as well as the conclusions of law, upon which the learned court based its decree, are so clearly and fully presented in the master’s report that further reference to them is unnecessary. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, with costs to be paid by appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorman v. O'Connor, 26 A. 379, 155 Pa. 239, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1231 (Pa. 1893).

26 A. 379 (Gorman v. O'Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adelphia Lodge No. 1 v. Adelphia Lodge No. 1
72 P.R. 456 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1951)
La Respetable Logia Adelphia Núm. 1 v. La Respetable Logia Adelphia Num. 1
72 P.R. Dec. 488 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1951)
Bridgeport Brass Workers Union v. Thomas Smith
15 Conn. Super. Ct. 505 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1948)
SKF Employees Ass'n v. Root
57 Pa. D. & C. 12 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1946)
Winnetka Trust & Savings Bank v. Practical Refrigerating Engineers Ass'n
54 N.E.2d 253 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1944)
Hamilton v. White
22 P.2d 1089 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1933)
Downing v. Schearer
2 Pa. D. & C. 544 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Supreme Lodge of the World v. Los Angeles Lodge No. 386
169 P. 1040 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
Kayley v. McCourt
83 A. 830 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)