Goldston v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Goldston v. State

629 S.E.2d 850, 360 N.C. 363, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 157, 2006 WL 1077286

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 2, 2006

DocketNo. 328PA04-2.

StatusPublished

This text of 629 S.E.2d 850 (Goldston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldston v. State, 629 S.E.2d 850, 360 N.C. 363, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 157, 2006 WL 1077286 (N.C. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 25th day of October 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of constitutional issues of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 25th day of October 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of constitutional issues of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

629 S.E.2d 850, 360 N.C. 363, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 157, 2006 WL 1077286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldston-v-state-nc-2006.