Gaia Technologies, Inc. v. Reconversion Technologies, Inc.
This text of 91 F.3d 166 (Gaia Technologies, Inc. v. Reconversion Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
91 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
GAIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RECONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Reconversion Technologies
of Texas, Inc., Progressive Capital Corporation,
David Gordon, Ira Rimer, Joel Holt and
Richard Clark, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 95-1415.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 16, 1996.
ORDER
The parties having so agreed, it is
ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F.3d 166, 1996 WL 335458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaia-technologies-inc-v-reconversion-technologies-inc-cafc-1996.