FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 26

Ownership; assignment

35 U.S.C. § 261
Title35Patents
Chapter26 — OWNERSHIP AND ASSIGNMENT

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 261 (Ownership; assignment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 261.

Text

Subject to the provisions of this title, patents shall have the attributes of personal property. The Patent and Trademark Office shall maintain a register of interests in patents and applications for patents and shall record any document related thereto upon request, and may require a fee therefor. Applications for patent, patents, or any interest therein, shall be assignable in law by an instrument in writing. The applicant, patentee, or his assigns or legal representatives may in like manner grant and convey an exclusive right under his application for patent, or patents, to the whole or any specified part of the United States. A certificate of acknowledgment under the hand and official seal of a person authorized to administer oaths within the United States, or, in a foreign country, of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC
584 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 2018)
92 case citations
Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLC
625 F.3d 1359 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
91 case citations
Weinar v. Rollform Inc.
744 F.2d 797 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
79 case citations
Mullane v. Chambers
333 F.3d 322 (First Circuit, 2003)
67 case citations
Israel Bio-Engineering Project v. Amgen Inc.
475 F.3d 1256 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
64 case citations
Valley Drug Company v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
344 F.3d 1294 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
61 case citations
Figueroa v. United States
466 F.3d 1023 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
49 case citations
In re Ornum
686 F.2d 937 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1982)
36 case citations
Gaia Technologies, Inc. v. Reconversion Technologies, Inc.
93 F.3d 774 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
33 case citations
Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.
16 F.R.D. 141 (S.D. California, 1954)
31 case citations
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Genetics Institute, Inc.
52 F.3d 1026 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
22 case citations
International Gamco, Inc. v. Multimedia Games, Inc.
504 F.3d 1273 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
21 case citations
Grayton v. United States
92 Fed. Cl. 327 (Federal Claims, 2010)
16 case citations
Everex Systems, Inc. v. Cadtrak Corp. (In re CFLC, Inc.)
89 F.3d 673 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
13 case citations
TomTom, Inc. v. AOT Systems GmbH
893 F. Supp. 2d 785 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
6 case citations
Public Varieties of Mississippi, Inc. v. Sun Valley Seed Co.
734 F. Supp. 250 (N.D. Mississippi, 1990)
5 case citations
Pittsburg State University v. Kansas Board of Regents
122 P.3d 336 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2005)
3 case citations
University of West Virginia, Board of Trustees v. Vanvoorhies
342 F.3d 1290 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
3 case citations

Source Credit

History

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 810; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 97–247, §14(b), Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 321; Pub. L. 112–211, title II, §201(d), Dec. 18, 2012, 126 Stat. 1535.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §47 (R.S. 4898, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §5, 29 Stat. 93 [29 Stat. 693], (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §6, 42 Stat. 391, (3) Aug. 18, 1941, ch. 370, 55 Stat. 634).
The first paragraph is new but is declaratory only. The second paragraph is the same as in the corresponding section of existing statute. The third paragraph is from the existing statute, a specific reference to another statute is omitted. The fourth paragraph is the same as the existing statute but language has been changed.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2012—Pub. L. 112–211 inserted "The Patent and Trademark Office shall maintain a register of interests in patents and applications for patents and shall record any document related thereto upon request, and may require a fee therefor." at end of first par. and substituted "An interest that constitutes an assignment" for "An assignment" in fourth par.
1982—Pub. L. 97–247 inserted ", or apostille of an official designated by a foreign country which, by treaty or convention, accords like effect to apostilles of designated officials in the United States".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2012 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–211 effective on the date that is 1 year after Dec. 18, 2012, applicable to patents issued before, on, or after that effective date and patent applications pending on or filed after that effective date, and not effective with respect to patents in litigation commenced before that effective date, see section 203 of Pub. L. 112–211, set out as an Effective Date note under section 27 of this title.

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–247 effective Aug. 27, 1982, see section 17(a) of Pub. L. 97–247, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.

Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/261.