F.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

F.W. v. State

29 So. 3d 428, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2862

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 2010·No. No. 5D09-2138·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court [429]*429erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See S.D.J. v. State, 21 So.3d 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudication of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court [429]*429erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See S.D.J. v. State, 21 So.3d 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudication of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

F.W. v. State, 29 So. 3d 428, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

29 So. 3d 428 (F.W. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related