D.A. v. State
Opinion
We hold that it was error for the trial court to impose costs of prosecution pursuant to section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2007) on D.A., a juvenile who was adjudicated delinquent.
This is an issue of statutory interpretation, which is subject to a de novo standard of review. Kasischke v. State, 991 So.2d 803, 807 (Fla.2008). Section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2007) provides for the imposition of costs of prosecution, as follows:
In all criminal cases, convicted persons are liable for payment of documented costs of prosecution, including investigative costs incurred by law enforcement agencies, by fire departments for arson investigations, and by investigations of the Department of Financial Services or the Office of Financial Regulation of the Financial Services Commission, if requested by such agencies. These costs shall be included and entered in the judgment rendered against the convicted person.
A juvenile who has been adjudicated delinquent has not been “convicted,” and is not a “criminal.” See § 985.35(6), Fla. Stat. (2007)
Accordingly, we reverse the order imposing costs of prosecution on D.A.
Reversed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
11 So. 3d 423 (D.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.