S.D.J. v. State

21 So. 3d 140, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16552, 2009 WL 3672089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 2009
DocketNo. 5D09-1287
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 So. 3d 140 (S.D.J. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.D.J. v. State, 21 So. 3d 140, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16552, 2009 WL 3672089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on a juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudication of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

MONACO, C.J., LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FW v. State
29 So. 3d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 So. 3d 140, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16552, 2009 WL 3672089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sdj-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.