Home/U.S. Customs Court/Friedman v. United States

Friedman v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 875, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1913
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Friedman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cust. Ct. 660 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 29, 1967·No. No. P67/83; protests 65/60, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bulrush baskets similar in all material respects to the rush baskets the subject of Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, Watson, and Rao, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 875, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1913 (cusc 1967).

58 Cust. Ct. 875 (Friedman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 103 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)