Friedman v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 522, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1518
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Friedman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cust. Ct. 660
United States Customs Court·Decided December 20, 1965·No. No. 69705; protests 265801-K, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Zanin & Son, Inc. v. United States (50 Cust. Ct. 37, C.D. 2385), and Abstract 67834, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 522, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1518 (cusc 1965).

55 Cust. Ct. 522 (Friedman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zanin & Son, Inc. v. United States
50 Cust. Ct. 37 (U.S. Customs Court, 1963)