Friedman v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Friedman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cust. Ct. 660
United States Customs Court·Decided November 22, 1966·No. No. P66/347; No. P66/348·Published

Opinion

Nichols, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bags or baskets in chief value of rush similar in all material respects to those the subject of Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 831 (cusc 1966).

57 Cust. Ct. 831 (Friedman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 103 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)