Friedman v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Friedman v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 873

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 23, 1967

DocketNo. P67/74; protests 58/7806, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P67/75; protests 61/6587, etc. (Philadelphia)

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 873 (Friedman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 873 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rush bags or baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Garson M. Simon <& Go. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, Watson, and Bao, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rush bags or baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Garson M. Simon <& Go. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, Watson, and Bao, Judges.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cust. Ct. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-united-states-cusc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack