Friedman v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 392
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Friedman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 216 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 18, 1960·No. No. 63977; protests 58/12069 and 58/23222 (Philadelphia)·Published
Opinion
[393]*393Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nonelectric dry shavers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63302, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 392 (cusc 1960).
44 Cust. Ct. 392 (Friedman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.