Friedman v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Friedman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 216 →
United States Customs Court·Decided February 26, 1958·No. No. 61588; protests 272080-K, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of harness hardware for use with harness for dogs the same in all material respects as that involved in International Expediters, Inc., et al. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 230, C. D. 1868), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 459 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 459 (Friedman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
International Expediters, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 230 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)