Friedman v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 404
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Friedman v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 216
United States Customs Court·Decided December 27, 1957·No. No. 61424; protests 297681-K and 306798-K (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

[405]*405Opinion by

La whence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal seals for bottles and metal disks or caps, not decorated, colored, waxed, lacquered, enameled, lithographed, electroplated, nor embossed in color, the same in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of Cribari & Sons v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 19, C. D. 6), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 404 (cusc 1957).

40 Cust. Ct. 404 (Friedman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cribari v. United States
1 Cust. Ct. 19 (U.S. Customs Court, 1938)