Friedman v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Friedman v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 620

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 1, 1959

DocketReap. Dec. 9412; Entry No. 11015

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 620 (Friedman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 620 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain plywood exported from Finland and entered at the port of Philadelphia, Pa.

. . Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended, and that such statutory value therefor is the appraised value, less 4 per centum, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain plywood exported from Finland and entered at the port of Philadelphia, Pa.

. . Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended, and that such statutory value therefor is the appraised value, less 4 per centum, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-united-states-cusc-1959.